Matribhumi Samachar English
Bengaluru: The arrest of social worker and Hindu activist Puneeth Kerehalli by Bengaluru police has triggered sharp criticism, with supporters and civil society voices alleging selective action, political pressure and suppression of citizen-led scrutiny over illegal immigration from Bangladesh.
Puneeth Kerehalli was taken into custody on January 16(late Friday night) from his residence by Bannerghatta police and brought to the police station for questioning. The arrest followed his recent visits, along with associates, to alleged illegal migrant sheds in different parts of Bengaluru, where he questioned residents about nationality and documentation and shared videos on social media seeking accountability from the government.
Supporters argue that Kerehalli’s actions were aimed at highlighting a serious and long-ignored issue—unchecked illegal migration and its impact on civic order, security and public resources in the state capital. They claim the arrest sends a dangerous message that citizens who raise uncomfortable questions may face police action instead of institutional engagement.
Allegations of political pressure
Soon after news of the arrest broke, supporters accused the government of acting under ideological pressure. Several activists released videos alleging that the police move was a result of pressure from left-leaning groups and “pseudo-secular” organisations that, they say, routinely oppose scrutiny of illegal immigration.
“This is not about law and order; this is about silencing voices that question the system”, said one supporter in a video message. “If asking about nationality and legality is a crime, then what is the role of the government and police?” They argue that instead of conducting transparent surveys and action against illegal settlements, authorities are targeting individuals who bring the issue to public attention.
Complaint and counter-allegations
The arrest follows a complaint submitted to the Karnataka Director General of Police demanding criminal action against Kerehalli and his associates. The complaint alleged that he illegally entered migrant settlements, demanded identity documents, intimidated workers and used social media to label Muslim migrant workers as “Bangladeshis”, thereby creating communal tension.
While the allegations are serious and warrant due legal scrutiny, critics point out that arresting a social activist at night without first issuing notices or exploring less coercive measures appears excessive and disproportionate.
Legal observers note that questioning government inaction or highlighting possible illegalities if done without physical harm or direct threats falls within the realm of free expression and civic activism, which should be addressed through dialogue or lawful inquiry, not immediate arrest.
Selective enforcement?
Critics have also raised questions about selective enforcement. Bengaluru has repeatedly witnessed concerns over unregulated migrant settlements, fire safety violations, poor living conditions and alleged criminal networks operating from informal sheds. Despite this, comprehensive government action has remained limited.
“Why are the authorities not conducting city-wide verification drives instead of targeting one individual?” asked a civic activist. “If Puneeth Kerehalli is wrong, prove it legally. Arresting him without addressing the core issue looks like avoidance”.
Chilling effect on activism
Many fear that the arrest could have a chilling effect on grassroots activism. Social workers argue that if citizens are discouraged from questioning governance failures, accountability will weaken further.
Kerehalli himself, in earlier statements, had challenged the government to prove wrongdoing, saying he would not accept restrictions imposed through “misuse of authority”. His supporters maintain that activism should not be conflated with criminal intent.
Civil liberties advocates have called on the Karnataka government and police to act with restraint, ensure transparency in the investigation and avoid turning legitimate public concerns into law-and-order issues.
Credit : Organiser Weekly
